There are many strategies of play, from NoName balance method to the boat more than three, and later were amazing note, gossip Jiugong, all kinds of cables, etc., etc.
Lack some of the intentions of those who, very sincere to share out, the authors generally spend a lot of time and effort to research and test, then share it should be said that the boundless beneficence.
Of course, there are also some cherished aim misconduct, but the vast majority still belong to the salvation of mind to share.
I read most posts about these policies, page by page next turn, afraid to miss an important chapter did not realize that, long ago wanted to sum up, later found in common is this: the advantages of these strategies the advantages are not gamblers.
I do not know what it outlined is correct, can only talk about his views:
In my mind, gamblers should be relatively two sides, either win or lose.
for example:
Bank deposit interest annually about 3-4%, approximately 4.5% for five years on a regular basis, in addition to the bank's account manager will provide some premium, 100A about a year 1A (because the interest owned by the central bank set up to only float 10 %, so local banks are dark premium).
Normally we would think that this is the package profit no loss, but there is no concept of amplitude,
This, as the vast majority of the policy approach or various cables are ultra-low rate of return, then large numbers to amplify the actual profit.
Politically more stable, but can not rule out banks will collapse, foreign bank runs happened frequently, might also turn to us, right?
This, as the vast majority of policy-off cable, giving the impression that something in the foreseeable future and is not going to happen, that is ultra-small probability event.
Back to the topic, if the form of deposits to understand Baccarat, then we are not in the DB? Obviously not! Advantage of the players and the strategies players will say that we present is not DB, but in Bo yields.
More advanced players will consider the advantages of inflation, the subsequent economic environment, etc. These factors negate positive return interest on deposits.
The two sides gamblers lose and win, lose limit is clear bag limit can be said to win nearly limitless, at least you can arrive at a position of principal ignored.
Most policies are based on guaranteed income under dispute, because of this, it is easy to be accepted by the gambler, willing to fight.
Cable law, most still evolved from a straight cable, straight cable is able to beat the casino, but could not beat Taiwan red, because of this, so the concept of cable constantly being spend.
But the purpose of the various cable law in the pursuit of feeling has not conflict with the principal, even if it is low income is also recognized stage.
That is, you have a 90% chance to get 10% of the profits, you also have a 10% probability of losing 90% of the principal amount.
It is so, so I think I understand the advantages and most methods of the advantages of chasing the ball there is a conflict, I think the advantage is that I have a 50% chance to lose 100% of the principal, but I also have a 50% possibility to win 101% of the profits.
I do not know that can make you understand, I'll use a baccarat card type to illustrate the differences between the two,
Free bets bookmakers commission table, two idle before 4:00, 6:00 village, leisure Bo card,
1, the conventional strategy of hope lies in the Player Bo out 1/8/9/10 / J / Q / K, so steady income 50% of profits.
2. I understand the dominant strategy is a 6/7 Player Bo, Bo dealer has the opportunity to win a card and thus escaped half of the situation, the 7 Player Bo, Bo out of the dealer as long as no 4 or 5, or to win, but we must consider the well-Bo card or only win half the situation.
Bo is not making the 4,5,10, probability J, Q, K should be 7/13, the percentage is 54% replaced, meaning that Player Bo to 7, then the dealer has 54% probability to win back 50 ʱ??
However, if the dealer Bo to 4, the equivalent of losing 150%.
So that I do not know whether I understand the point of conflict to understand the advantages and forums in which various strategies?
For this reason, in the course of long-term war, it gave me the feeling is not afraid of clear bags, afraid not win.
Probably understand that, I just efforts to find a strategic advantage as I understand it, if the dealer says I talk with someone, I get 10A out of gambling, if I gambled, you returned to me 1A, the dealer agreed.
Count if I hit village of pumping, I go on a stud, that I take 9A Bo 9.5A, so, as I understand the advantage of a 50% chance I lost 90% of the principal amount, 50% The possibility I won 95% of the principal amount.
Many people think that this assumption is not true, not so good bookmakers give us, in fact may be small, but it is there, I am here to talk about the strategic advantages of example only I understand the difference between play cable pursue stable income.
"Prisoner's Dilemma", from game theory point of view, talking about the police took two thieves tried separately, if both men were guilty, each person will be sentenced to eight years, if a thief pleaded guilty to confess, then the recognition will be reduced sentence Semi-plus years do not recognize, if the two do not recognize ,,, so police can only prosecute all off Sichuangminzhai thief sentenced to a year of punishment, there are three possibilities: 8 + 8 = 16, 10 + 4 = 14 years, 1 + 1 = 2 years.
The best way to not guilty, but because it is tried separately, so psychologically different, two thieves are likely to want to be frank, this has become the worst result, had a good situation, it is the psychological factor to living a spoiler!
Many strategic approach, too, more afraid of losing, so the first "confession", frankly poles is even a 50% probability to win a 50% and 50% probability to maintain results.
The strategy I understand that, but do not recognize, or sentenced me to 10 years, or sentenced me to one year, for eight years, a 50 percent probability of losing 25%, 50% probability of winning by 90%.
