Recently month and a half, do not know they are lucky or really find a good way, and win some money, a little want to go career path, but worried about the moment really good luck, so help me posting Supreme REFERENCES:
40 days looks, the average daily wager no more than five hands, the stakes do not exceed twice the base code, the majority (80% of it) will go a base code, usually a few days lose one day win, I lose a little increase after A few yards (10 percent), a few yards into a current 1.4 times the original base code, and won almost 30 yards, I personally feel a continued trend go on to win.
Before playing, when in fact there is a day for a month to win 1000, but will be doubled under, so finally met one day lost 20,000 look, and then another time also lose a big total or lost;
Now this case is more than 40 days, the average daily also won 1000, when more than 2000, when hundreds of pages have less, lose when there are no more than 2,000 a day, and the basic twelve days hit back, probably Win 3,4 days or more lost time.
But please give the younger expert recommendations.
PS, I feel of betting, the method does not sell, do not pinch, it is really to ask, thank you.
Players: As long as the advantages of play, the negative returns of the game, play longer lose more, winning the people are not disciplined, sometimes big bets won, thus offsetting the loss of a small stack losses , also said negative chase, for example -10 +50 -10-10-10-10 such hits 20% guaranteed, bet this thing anyway, long losing bet, do not believe you used software testing 100,000 shoe brand look Look, Swallow in all methods, all bets law, at 100,000 test boots are ultimately loss.
Players: V. NOTE day, 40 days 200, you think you can explain what ?? really advise, pure luck, do not take the job, not the time still a long road back could turn back the best...
Players: No need to say how much the bet, you just have to figure out where a 1 + 1> 2, we can continue.
Players: There are two ways to judge, a simple one complex: A: If you can prove in theory, the play can get + EV, is effective II: If you can not prove that, in theory, that the play is completely unchanged Verify that the case for at least one year, such as the style of play there is even a little bit to adjust, then verify the calculation of the re-start three: Whatever the case, do not easily consider "functional gamble."
